

Ironically, because the M1 is so fast, according to some reviews, Windows ARM runs faster as a VM on a M1 Mac than it does on a Surface Pro natively.

I wonder if VMware has a skunk works project going on to do the same I'm sure VMWare is watching how the Parallels experiment goes and whether consumers take to it. Even still the, it's actually quite amazing that it can be done, that a 32/64-bit Intel Windows app can run under emulation on a ARM version of Windows built for Qualcomm's ARM chip, running as a Virtual Machine on a Apple Mac with a Apple designed ARM processor. Lingering application issues, emulation of Intel, problems running older 32-bit Intel apps (under emulation). It's a proof of concept, the bigger issue is, will running the ARM version Windows satisfy people who want to run Windows on a Apple Silicon Mac, because Windows ARM still has it's own issues even on official Windows hardware like the Surface Pro. I've tried it, it works, for the most part, still a lot of work to do, but interesting. So, Parallels is showing off a Technical Preview of Parallels that can run the ARM version of Windows on Apple Silicon apps. When you install macOS Ventura as the guest operating system, the system reboots or the guest operating system is unable to connect to a network. The virtual machine shows network issues with macOS Ventura as the guest operating system.The activity monitor on the mac host shows 100% CPU usage for vmware-vmx and vmnet-natd processes while the guest operating system is disconnected from the network. When you configure NAT on a macOS Monterey host and enable VPN, the guest operating system is disconnected from the internet. When VPN with NAT is enabled on macOS Monterey host, the guest operating system cannot connect to the internet.If you use a localized user interface in Fusion 13, some of the options in the Fusion menu might appear in English.

